Setup and Interface
Setting up GeForce Now for the first time is a bit of a nightmare. When you log into the service, which is available on PC, Mac, and Android, you’re presented with a sort of junior varsity Steam client. There’s a carousel of hot games, but at this point, it’s filled with old titles like Cuphead and Tropico 6. I was thrilled to load up Halo: The Master Chief collection, but it wasn’t available. Neither was Monster Hunter World, Red Dead Redemption 2, Temtem, or Control. GeForce now currently supports more than 400 titles, but there’s no place where they’re all listed. Instead you can either scroll through a limited list of “featured” games, or use the search bar to check for the game you want to play. The library is already much more impressive than the paltry selection found on Google Stadia, but it’s still disappointing when you’re especially amped for a certain game, only to find it not available on the service.Visual Performance
Every single person reading this is going to have a different experience with GeForce Now’s performance. Whether you’re gaming on Wi-Fi, Ethernet, or cellular, our environments are drastically varied, with different ISPs, routers, congestion, and limitations. Heck, I had a great experience in one room of my house, and a slipshod experience in another. Nvidia recommends a minimum of 15 mbps for 60fps at 720p or 30 mbps for 1080p, and suggests connecting via Ethernet for the best experience. In testing, sometimes you need a fair bit more than that. My office is the furthest room from my modem and router, so I wasn’t surprised to find GeForce struggle there, despite having much faster speeds than required. When I checked, I was rocking 48.56 Mbps down and 41.63 Mbps up. Under those conditions, the quality of my experience depended just as much on my internet speeds as which game I was playing. Less resource-intensive games, like Cuphead, played perfectly. Despite the game requiring lightning-fast reflexes, I was able to make my way easily through several boss fights. But when I tried more graphically intensive games, like Destiny 2, the game stuttered, I felt noticeable latency, and the visuals descended into a smudgy, cubist hellscape. During one mission, I died over and over again, unable to discern friends from enemies from random trees. Just a few miles away, at the IGN headquarters, connections were unstable and stream quality varied wildly. That’s despite having a fairly stable 50-60 Mbps connection, though the congestion of the corporate network could be just as much to blame. I took my horribly outdated Macbook Pro to a friend’s house and at 24.71 Down and 4.71 up, I found Apex Legends virtually unplayable, descending into the surrealist, blocky oil painting that’s so familiar with a poor connection. In my living room, with my router nearby, nearly every game I played through GeForce Now looked stunning and played with indiscernible latency, whether on my desktop, Macbook, or using Shield TV. And honestly, I would hope so; my speeds held steady at about 200 Mbps down. I don’t think many people will have that kind of network luxury, but it completely changed my experience. In fact, I could barely tax it. At one point I simulated a congested network by streaming music to my Sonos, watching YouTube TV, and loading a video on my phone. Even with all that going on, Destiny 2 and Fortnite didn't falter in the slightest. Each game looked pristine and I had no noticeable latency. Apex Legends, on the other hand, often yielded a “spotty connection” alert, and was prone to framerate drops and visual problems, no matter what my connection speed. Doom seemed to sit between Apex and Destiny. After an hour-plus of gaming (with visual settings maxed) I can say the game performed rather admirably. The game stuttered maybe three times, but quickly righted itself. Only twice did it significantly impact my gameplay. But losing even a split second of visuals every twenty minutes is intolerable in many games. I’m not really convinced that streaming is ever going to provide the crispest graphical fidelity, and GeForce Now hasn’t changed my mind. Apex Legends, for example, looked pretty underwhelming – even with the visual settings cranked up. But when I loaded up Tomb Raider, I was able to max the visuals completely, turning all the graphics options to ultra – textures, hair quality, you name it. Even with everything cranked to the max, the game still streamed without any lag or buffering. [widget path="global/page/imagecomparison" parameters="comparisons=%7B%22comparisons%22%3A%5B%7B%22caption%22%3A%22The%20Witcher%203%20using%20the%20Ultra%20graphics%20preset%20at%201080p.%22%2C%22images%22%3A%5B%7B%22id%22%3A%225e3df5eee4b035b46686e005%22%2C%22label%22%3A%22Witcher%203%20on%20GeForce%20Now%22%7D%2C%7B%22id%22%3A%225e3df5e7e4b0e6d43845e6ec%22%2C%22label%22%3A%22Witcher%203%20on%20RTX%202080%20Ti%22%7D%5D%7D%5D%7D"] That’s the first time I’ve been truly wowed by graphics through a streaming platform. As more games are added that support RTX (Nvidia’s branding for ray tracing), I expect visuals to become even more impressive. Currently, RTX is only available for a handful of games and is restricted to those who pay for a GeForce Now subscription (currently priced at $4.99 a month). If you have a gaming PC, you’re probably within your rights to be incredulous. After all, what’s the difference between being stuck in the room with the fastest internet and the room with your gaming rig? But for that small contingency of gamers who 1) don’t own a gaming PC, 2) want to play the best PC games, and 3) have blazing fast internet – GeForce Now seems like a winner. In some ways, it’s almost perfectly suited for Mac enthusiasts, though the in-your-face gamer aesthetic will doubtlessly turn many of them off.Latency and Bandwidth Usage
If your internet is fast enough, it’s really difficult to perceive any latency with GeForce Now. The only time I really felt any was when I was playing graphically-intensive games far from the router. In our tests, the latency from input to action on screen was between 150ms and 183ms. That means every button press was registered in less than .2 seconds. That’s not scorching fast and people who are prone to notice every input – competitive fighting pros come to mind – may find it unconscionable. After all, the infamous 8 frames of lag in Street Fighter 5 roughly translated to about 135 ms. Still, without getting too in the weeds, I don’t believe 150ms will be perceptible to most players – at best, my reaction time is only marginally faster anyway. GeForce Now has several settings that can ameliorate or exacerbate your latency as well. Streaming quality is decided by flipping a toggle: Balanced, Data Saver, Competitive, or Custom. The three generic options allow you to incentivize resolution, frames per second, or bandwidth. Nvidia approximates data usage, and it varied from 4 GBs to 10 GBs per hour, depending on which Streaming Quality you select. Somewhat surprisingly, Competitive, which optimizes for 120 FPS, isn’t intended to use the most data – it sits around an approximated 6 GB/hr. By dropping the FPS in the Custom tab, you can get the bandwidth usage down to what Nvidia suggests will be about 2 GB/hr.Purchasing Guide
Nvidia GeForce Now is available for PC, Mac, Android, and Shield TV. The free tier gives standard access with 1-hour play sessions, while a subscription currently priced at $4.99/month gives priority access to servers, 6-hour session length, and access to RTX in games that support it. There’s currently a limited-time 90-day introductory period available for free.from IGN Reviews https://ift.tt/377hi4P
This could be a real lead forward for personal gaming... Revolutionise gaming
No comments:
Post a Comment